Quote:
Originally Posted by billybob
well you have me there, the Clintons have no morals!!! So you had rather have a man president with no morals than a woman vp that teaches morals and her daughter makes a mistake???
|
I think Bill Clinton was a bad president and that Hillary is evil personified. I've said both in the past. Frequently. However, they never set themselves up on a pedestal just to have their daughter bring them right back down by proving their platitudes to be hollow and meaningless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niccivan
Riiiight. Because most children heed what their parents say. Or not. You were a child once. I bet you could name a few things you didn't listen to your parents about and learned things the hard way. I bet we ALL can. I bet over 75% of here had sex in our teens, regardless of what our parents taught us.
You are failing to see that just because parents teach certain things, doesn't mean the children will automatically listen. Does it mean they have failed as parents? Hell no!!! My parents still preach abstinence to my kids, when obviously I didn't follow through with it. Should they have given up believing in it when I fell pregnant? No. They are still very avid believers.
|
And what you are failing to see is that a politician who preaches abstinence and unsafe sex cannot politically afford to have one of her own children fuck up so badly, so to speak. What you are failing to see is that I am not passing judgment on the daughter -- I am passing judgment on the mother who has had a key element of her unrealistic, 14th century platform blow up in her face. I don't know whether Sarah Palin is a good, bad, or indifferent parent, nor do I know whether she actually believes in the "traditional" values she preaches. What I do know is that it looks very, very bad for a politician pushing for waiting until you're married to have her teenage daughter knocked up in the middle of an election year.